Use in commerce means genuine commercial activity under the mark — bona fide sales of goods with the mark on them, or bona fide rendering of services advertised under the mark, in interstate or foreign commerce. Token sales or staged transactions don't qualify. The USPTO requires evidence of actual ordinary-course-of-trade use for a use-based application.
Confirm you've made a bona fide sale in interstate commerce under the mark before filing use-based — without it, file intent-to-use instead.
Use in commerce is a legal standard with specific requirements; filing use-based without meeting the standard wastes the filing fee.
Check whether your mark has been used in a bona fide interstate commercial transaction — a real sale to a customer in another state or country counts.
The Lanham Act at 15 U.S.C. §1127 defines “use in commerce” as bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark.[1] The definition emphasizes that the use must be real commercial activity, not a staged transaction designed to create the appearance of commerce.
The statute uses “interstate or foreign commerce” to establish federal jurisdiction. Purely intrastate commerce (entirely within one state) may still qualify if it substantially affects interstate commerce. Online sales, sales to out-of-state customers, and sales involving shipping across state lines all typically qualify for interstate commerce purposes.
The statute distinguishes between goods and services with specific requirements for each. The distinction matters because the nature of commercial use differs between tangible products and services.
Specimens differ correspondingly. Goods specimens typically show the mark on packaging, labels, or point-of-sale materials. Service specimens show the mark in advertising materials or on websites offering the services. The USPTO reviews specimens to confirm the mark’s actual commercial use in the context claimed.[2]
Specimens are evidence submitted with a use-based application to show the mark in commercial use. The USPTO has specific requirements for what qualifies as an acceptable specimen, and specimen rejections are among the more common office action reasons.
| For goods | For services |
|---|---|
| Photos of product with mark on packaging | Website screenshots showing mark and services offered |
| Hang tags or product labels | Brochures, business cards, or flyers |
| Packaging with mark prominently displayed | Advertisements in print or online media |
| Point-of-sale displays in retail locations | Service menus or client-facing materials |
| Catalog pages with mark-bearing products | Signage at service location |
Specimen preparation is worth careful attention before filing. A properly prepared specimen that clearly shows the mark in commerce, matches the goods/services description, and demonstrates real commercial activity reduces the likelihood of specimen-related office actions.
If the USPTO determines that the claimed use doesn’t meet the bona fide use standard, the application faces a specimen refusal, requires amendment to intent-to-use, or gets abandoned. Each outcome has different consequences.
Most use-based applications with good-faith specimen issues resolve through amendment to intent-to-use or through submission of proper specimens. Problems arise when applicants overclaim use — either deliberately or through misunderstanding of the standard — which can invalidate registrations even after they issue. The safe approach is to file intent-to-use when actual use hasn’t started, rather than filing use-based with insufficient evidence.
Online activity can qualify as use in commerce when it involves real commercial transactions under the mark. E-commerce sales, SaaS subscriptions, and online service delivery all typically qualify. Mere website presence or marketing activity alone usually does not.
The analysis focuses on whether real commerce is happening under the mark, not on how the commerce reaches customers. An online business making actual sales meets the use-in-commerce standard the same way a brick-and-mortar business does — the distribution channel is different, but the commercial reality is the same.
Founders sometimes equate “using the mark” with any activity involving the brand name. Marketing materials, social posts, website launches, and other pre-commercial activity all feel like using the mark. From the USPTO’s perspective, none of those activities qualify as use in commerce unless real commercial transactions are happening under the mark.
The specific requirement is bona fide commercial activity — a customer paying for goods bearing the mark, or paying for services rendered under the mark. Until that transaction happens, the mark is in preparation, not in use. Filing use-based before real commerce exists misrepresents the application and often produces specimen refusals or fraud exposure.
This is where Responsible Asset-Building respects the legal standard even when the marketing feels advanced. If no bona fide sales have happened, file intent-to-use. When sales begin, file use-based or convert an intent-to-use filing via Statement of Use. Matching the filing basis to the actual commercial state of the business is procedurally correct and avoids the complications that come from overclaiming use. An educated consumer understands the use-in-commerce standard precisely and files accordingly.
Technically one bona fide sale can qualify, but a single sale may look pretextual to the USPTO examining attorney. Most applicants wait until they have a pattern of ordinary-course-of-trade sales — typically several real transactions with actual customers in interstate commerce. The amount of sales needed is a judgment call; for most businesses, waiting until a natural pattern of commerce exists is safer than rushing to file after a single transaction.
Potentially, but carefully. The USPTO requires use in 'commerce that Congress may regulate,' which typically means interstate or foreign commerce. Purely intrastate commerce may still qualify if it substantially affects interstate commerce — for example, if suppliers come from out of state or if marketing reaches across state lines. For clear qualification, wait until you have at least one interstate sale before filing use-based.
A specimen is evidence of actual commercial use. For goods, typical specimens are photos of products with the mark on packaging or labels. For services, typical specimens are website screenshots, marketing materials, or advertisements showing the mark with the offered services. Create specimens by capturing real commercial materials — photos, screenshots, or scans — that document your actual use in commerce.
Yes, if it's a bona fide commercial transaction in the ordinary course of trade. A real sale to a legitimate customer — even a single transaction — satisfies the standard if the transaction represents genuine commerce. What doesn't qualify is a staged transaction with a friendly party designed solely to generate a specimen. The quality of the transaction matters more than the quantity.
Shipping in commerce can qualify for goods when the mark appears on the goods or packaging and the shipment represents real commercial activity. If you're shipping inventory to a retailer for resale, or fulfilling a customer order, the mark-bearing goods in interstate transportation qualifies. If the shipping is internal (between your own locations with no customer-facing commercial purpose), it typically doesn't qualify.
Third-party marketplace sales typically qualify as use in commerce. Selling through Amazon, Etsy, eBay, or similar platforms with your mark displayed on the product listings and during transactions meets the use-in-commerce standard. The key is that the mark appears in the customer-facing portion of the transaction and the product is actually sold. A specimen from a third-party marketplace page typically satisfies USPTO requirements.
Understand your brand, see what's worth protecting, and walk into any attorney conversation prepared. Enter your name and email once to unlock all three.